tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post6606157292920694352..comments2023-12-21T03:31:54.013-07:00Comments on Alternate Reality: Bush's Reality-Based Desperationcapthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04541180524537586259noreply@blogger.comBlogger29125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-44907373127884004942007-01-11T15:35:00.000-07:002007-01-11T15:35:00.000-07:00Mr Corn, if you read these comments, I have a bone...Mr Corn, if you read these comments, I have a bone to pick with you. Every time you say something like this:<br /><br />"But here's the obvious question: given the president's history of false and misleading statements about the war and his record of poor decision-making related to the war, why should anyone accept anything he says or proposes now?"<br /><br />I can't help but remember how you claim that impeachment is not an option. You recognize as well as anyone how bad a job he has done, yet deny the political feasibility of impeachment. I believe it is as Cornposters have been saying for months: no amount of whining, complaining and petitioning on our part, nor course corrections, personnel changes, mission statements, and other mismanagement on their part will bring an end to US involvement in this war. His ass must be impeached. Mark my words carefully, because I have an aching suspicion that I am correct in this assessment.Mookiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04796691428737135749noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-78622782263927695242007-01-11T14:36:00.000-07:002007-01-11T14:36:00.000-07:00New thread!New thread!capthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541180524537586259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-29831236623667949722007-01-11T13:50:00.000-07:002007-01-11T13:50:00.000-07:00Saladin,
The "powers that be" can change figureh...Saladin, <br /><br />The "powers that be" can change figureheads like nothing. The figureheads can be one side or the other. I'm not even sure impeachment could slow the handbasket down much. <br /><br />Bunnypants et al would just ignore it. <br /><br />UGH! <br /><br /><br /><br />captcapthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541180524537586259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-21126224163801864852007-01-11T13:44:00.000-07:002007-01-11T13:44:00.000-07:00Capt, as much as I want to see that psycho impeach...Capt, as much as I want to see that psycho impeached I don't think it will stop anything, beheading the puppet still leaves the puppeteers in charge, and they've really gone around the bend and come out the other side haven't they?Saladinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11756928226921879640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-74848612832017501362007-01-11T13:40:00.000-07:002007-01-11T13:40:00.000-07:00BTW -
Wilson AND Domenici were against the idea ...BTW - <br /><br />Wilson AND Domenici were against the idea os additional troops or the "surge". <br /><br />They are both Bushbots of the first order. <br /><br />Things that make me go Hmmmm. <br /><br /><br /><br />captcapthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541180524537586259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-15706029890431606592007-01-11T13:35:00.000-07:002007-01-11T13:35:00.000-07:00Today, at exactly 3:11 pm Eastern time, the House ...<b>Today, at exactly 3:11 pm Eastern time, the House of Representatives passed legislation that expands federal funding for embryonic stem cell research. </b><br /><br /><br />Praise the lord and pass the pancakes! This is a good thing. <br /><br /><br /><br />captcapthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541180524537586259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-68552419203164190562007-01-11T13:23:00.000-07:002007-01-11T13:23:00.000-07:00New Iraq Commander Spoke Up for Judith Miller
By J...<a href="http://www.nysun.com/article/46518">New Iraq Commander Spoke Up for Judith Miller<br />By JOSH GERSTEIN<br />Staff Reporter of the Sun<br />January 11, 2007 </a><br /><br /><br />The military commander President Bush is counting on to rescue Iraq from chaos, Lieutenant General David Petraeus, once came to the defense of an American reporter caught up in one of Washington's most intense legal battles.<br /><br />In 2005, when Judith Miller of the New York Times was facing the possibility of jail for refusing to name one of her sources in front of a grand jury, General Petraeus wrote to a federal judge to discourage him from imprisoning her.<br /><br />"Judith demonstrated a deep commitment to her work and values as an American citizen," the general wrote. "Based on my interaction with her, I find it unlikely that Judith would compromise on those values, to include betraying information gained in confidence from her sources. ... Judith is clearly a highly professional journalist, one who has demonstrated to me that she will keep her word."<br /><br /><a href="http://www.nysun.com/article/46518">More.</a><br /><br />*******************************<br /><br />This is the reality based General that the pResidunce is basing his hopes on?Robert Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01770441579698726632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-86543094188414792412007-01-11T13:17:00.000-07:002007-01-11T13:17:00.000-07:00Militarization of Embassies? Can you say J-O-H-N ...Militarization of Embassies? Can you say J-O-H-N N-E-G-R-O-P-O-N-T-E?<br /><br />Sure, I knew you could.Robert Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01770441579698726632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-38883551540373955742007-01-11T13:11:00.000-07:002007-01-11T13:11:00.000-07:00Since bluster is his only diplomacy, I guess the m...Since bluster is his only diplomacy, I guess the militarization of our Embassies makes perfect sense to him. <br /><br />Impeaching the SOB is our only shot at stopping him, even impeached I wonder . . . <br /><br /><br />captcapthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541180524537586259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-61900350693871128432007-01-11T13:09:00.001-07:002007-01-11T13:09:00.001-07:00Speaking of Embassies:
The crazyman and his maste...Speaking of Embassies:<br /><br />The crazyman and his masters and minions are using American <a HREF="http://www.fas.org/irp/congress/2006_rpt/embassies.html"><B>EMBASSIES AS COMMAND POSTS IN THE ANTI-TERROR CAMPAIGN</b></a> <br /><br />AAARRRGGGHHH!<br /><br />captcapthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541180524537586259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-19694754278088570352007-01-11T13:09:00.000-07:002007-01-11T13:09:00.000-07:00Capt., & O'Reilly,
"The War on Innocent Bystander...Capt., & O'Reilly,<br /><br />"The War on Innocent Bystanders" a phrase for the age!<br /><br />Consider the code phrase "rules of engagement." The rules that applied in Fallujah defined any male between puberty and wizzened as an enemy combatant. The same may now apply in Sadr City.Robert Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01770441579698726632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-16625860755960134832007-01-11T12:42:00.000-07:002007-01-11T12:42:00.000-07:00O'Reilly,
I heard they had a cure for any future...O'Reilly, <br /><br />I heard they had a cure for any future mistakes (ala Haditha) - if they F'up they call in an airstrike. No evidence of anything after the fact. <br /><br /><br /><br />captcapthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541180524537586259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-7920157983831937452007-01-11T12:09:00.000-07:002007-01-11T12:09:00.000-07:00Robert S. said...
Breaking: US killed no top Qaed...Robert S. said... <br />Breaking: US killed no top Qaeda targets in Somalia strike... <br /><br />It's troubling that so many reported successes in the war on terror turn out to be successes in the war on innocent bystanders. <br /><br />I assume reports of al Quida in Somolia are accurate and therefore I'm inclined to think our gunship attack was ordered to kill real targets rather than manipulate US public opinion and refresh support for the WoT. <br /><br />Having been so wrong about WMD in Iraq, you can understand how my DISTRUST of our own government has become a sever handicap for me in understand such events.<br /><br />Bush is once again taking action and creating a new reality. This approach is driven by his belief that there is good and evil in the world, and he is an agent for good. Whether his beliefs boarder on delusion is not important. What is important is that his ignorance about his own potential for ordering action that has evil consequences, in not part of his calculus.O'Reillyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02298161341394034059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-28476953304864000572007-01-11T11:53:00.000-07:002007-01-11T11:53:00.000-07:00Robert, Your letter is spot on. Thank you for sh...Robert, Your letter is spot on. Thank you for sharing it with us.O'Reillyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02298161341394034059noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-5116245219511396932007-01-11T11:28:00.000-07:002007-01-11T11:28:00.000-07:00De nada, Capt., two eyes on the ball are much bett...De nada, Capt., two eyes on the ball are much better than zero eyes on the ball.<br /><br />Joe Biden to the Dishonorable Sleezy Rice: "You do not, let me repeat, you do not have the authority to attack Iran."Robert Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01770441579698726632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-85795596357540665352007-01-11T10:53:00.000-07:002007-01-11T10:53:00.000-07:00Oop's
That's what I get for starting late, being...Oop's <br /><br />That's what I get for starting late, being in a hurry - jumping on out of disgust over a headline before reading the blog. <br /><br />Thanks Robert. <br /><br /><br />captcapthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541180524537586259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-93459561729631592007-01-11T10:51:00.000-07:002007-01-11T10:51:00.000-07:00Breaking: Bush invaded Iran last night
"Last ni...<a HREF="http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/46589/"><B>Breaking: Bush invaded Iran last night</b></a><br /><br /><br /><br />"Last night, Bush sent US forces to attack the inviolate territory of a foreign diplomatic mission, the Iranian mission in northern Iraq - legally, the land of a foreign nation - and took the Iranians hostage. It's hard to see under international law how this is legal, let alone how this isn't an act of war. And it's beyond ironic that we appear to have condoned the very action that we condemned Iran for - attacking diplomatic missions in violation of international law," writes John Aravosis.<br /><br />"But what's most troubling about this is the transparency of what Bush is up to. He's trying to provoke a war with Iran, either by forcing Iran to strike back, or by discovering secret Iranian diplomatic documents that would prove their complicity in helping the insurgents in Iraq. We just invaded Iran last night, folks. Foreign embassies and diplomatic outposts are legally the foreign soil of the country represented. We invaded Iran. This is an act of war."<br /><br />"U.S. forces in Iraq raided Iran's consulate in the northern city of Arbil and detained five staff members," according to state-run Iranian news, via Bloomberg.<br /><br />We don't know whether it was Iranians or Iranian diplomats who were captured or why the raid even took place. But the timing is curious, given Bush's speech last night.<br /><br /><br /><a HREF="http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/46589/">More HERE</a><br /><br />*****end of clip*****<br /><br />I bet the increase in troops has little or nothing to do with Iraq. It is all about Iran. <br /><br /><br /><br />captcapthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04541180524537586259noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-51416058806794062152007-01-11T10:32:00.000-07:002007-01-11T10:32:00.000-07:00Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) "I raise the issue ...Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) "I raise the issue that Sen. Boxer raised." - to the Dishonorable Sleezy Rice, as to why are the Brits leaving Iraq...?<br /><br />Is the poodle off the leash, or just being sent to the pound by the British voters?Robert Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01770441579698726632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-69927702284248340352007-01-11T10:07:00.000-07:002007-01-11T10:07:00.000-07:00"I have not been told the truth. I have not been ..."I have not been told the truth. I have not been told the truth over and over, again. And the American people have not been told the truth." - Senator Bill Nelson to the Dishonorable Sleezy Rice.Robert Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01770441579698726632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-22667184040078865882007-01-11T09:58:00.000-07:002007-01-11T09:58:00.000-07:00Raptors, Robots, and Rods from God
The Nightmare W...<a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=155521">Raptors, Robots, and Rods from God<br />The Nightmare Weaponry of Our Future<br />By Frida Berrigan </a><br /><br />We are not winning the war on terrorism (and would not be even if we knew what victory looked like) or the war in Iraq. Our track record in Afghanistan, as well as in the allied "war" on drugs, is hardly better. Yet the Pentagon is hard at work, spending your money, planning and preparing for future conflicts of every imaginable sort. From wars in space to sci-fi battlescapes without soldiers, scenarios are being scripted and weaponry prepared, largely out of public view, which ensures not future victories, but limitless spending that Americans can ill-afford now or twenty years from now.<br /><br />Even though today the Armed Forces can't recruit enough soldiers or adequately equip those already in uniform, the Pentagon is committing itself to massive corporate contracts for new high-tech weapons systems slated to come on-line years, even decades, from now, guaranteed only to enrich their makers. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/index.mhtml?pid=155521">More. </a><br /><br />******************************<br /><br />This theft from our nation, what does this massive ILLTH, as opposed to WEALTH, lead to?<br /><br />How about:<br /><br /><a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/011107P.shtml">Study: 744,000 Are Homeless in US<br /> By Stephen Ohlemacher<br /> The Associated Press Wednesday 10 January 2007 </a><br /><br /> There were 744,000 homeless people in the United States in 2005, according to the first national estimate in a decade. A little more than half were living in shelters, and nearly a quarter were chronically homeless, according to the report Wednesday by the National Alliance to End Homelessness, an advocacy group.<br /><br /> A majority of the homeless were single adults, but about 41 percent were in families, the report said.<br /><br /> The group compiled data collected by the Department of Housing and Urban Development from service providers throughout the country. It is the first national study on the number of homeless people since 1996. That study came up with a wide range for America's homeless population: between 444,000 and 842,000.<br /><br /> Counting people without permanent addresses, especially those living on the street, is an inexact process. But the new study is expected to provide a baseline to help measure progress on the issue.<br /><br /> "Having this data brings all of us another step closer to understanding the scope and nature of homelessness in America, and establishing this baseline is an extremely challenging task," HUD Secretary Alphonso Jackson said. "Understanding homelessness is a necessary step to addressing it successfully."<br /><br /> HUD is preparing to release its own report on homelessness in the coming weeks, Jackson said. In the future, the department plans to issue annual reports on the number of homeless people in the U.S.<br /><br /> Some cities and states have done their own counts of the homeless, providing a mix of trends, said Nan Roman, president of the National Alliance to End Homelessness. For example, New York City and San Francisco have seen decreases, while the number of homeless in Washington, D.C., has increased, Roman said.<br /><br /> "In the last 12 to 18 months, the homeless population has essentially exploded in Philadelphia," said Marsha Cohen, executive director of the Homeless Advocacy Project, which provides free legal services to the homeless in Philadelphia. "We are seeing big increases in singles and families, both on the street and attempting to enter the homeless system."<br /><br /> "It's a whole influx of new people, and that's the really scary part," Cohen said.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/011107P.shtml">More.</a>Robert Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01770441579698726632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-7550227227794893472007-01-11T09:45:00.000-07:002007-01-11T09:45:00.000-07:00Boxer vs. Rice, now on C-Span 2.Boxer vs. Rice, now on C-Span 2.Robert Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01770441579698726632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-49335524299711717702007-01-11T09:35:00.000-07:002007-01-11T09:35:00.000-07:00How do you expect to ever end this war, if ya can'...How do you expect to ever end this war, if ya can't sing any louder than that. - Country Joe McDonald, live from a TAZ (Google Hakim Bey for what is a TAZ) known as Woodstock Nation. Summer '69.<br /><br />The War Is Over<br />By Phil Ochs<br /><br />C#m<br />Silent Soldiers on a silver screen<br />A F#m E A F#m<br />Framed in fantasies and dragged in dream<br />Bm E7 A<br />Unpaid actors of the mystery<br />Bm E F#m E<br />The mad director knows that freedom will not make you free<br /> F#m E<br />And what's this got to do with me<br /> G D<br /> I declare the war is over<br /> A E E A E C#m<br /> It's over, it's over<br /><br />Drums are drizzling on a grain of sand<br />Fading rhythms of a fading land<br />Prove your courage in the proud parade<br />Trust your leaders where mistakes are almost never made<br />And they're afraid that I'm afraid<br /><br /> I'm afraid the war is over<br /> It's over, it's over<br /><br />Angry artists painting angry signs<br />Use their vision just to blind the blind<br />Poisoned players of a grizzly game<br />One is guilty and the other gets the point to blame<br />Pardon me if I refrain<br /><br /> I declare the war is over<br /> It's over, it's over<br /><br />So do your duty, boys, and join with pride<br />Serve your country in her suicide<br />Fly the flag so you can wave goodbye<br />But just before the end even treason might be worth a try<br />This country is to young to die<br /><br /> I declare the war is over<br /> It's over, it's over<br /><br />One-legged veterans will greet the dawn<br />And they're whistling marches as they mow the lawn<br />And the gargoyles only sit and grieve<br />The gypsy fortune teller told me that we'd been deceived<br />You only are what you believe<br /><br /> I believe the war is over<br /> It's over, it's over<br /><br />********************************<br /><br />Sing Out! I didn't excise the chords this time!Robert Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01770441579698726632noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-32834983316500497422007-01-11T09:31:00.000-07:002007-01-11T09:31:00.000-07:00WHY IRAN IS NEXT
Noel Gibeson
Free Market News
Th...WHY IRAN IS NEXT<br />Noel Gibeson<br />Free Market News<br /><br />Thursday, January 11, 2007 <br /><br /><br />In the petrodollar wars, stage one was Iraq and stage two is Iran. Both dared to propose to use the euro instead of the U.S. dollar (USD) to buy Middle East oil. That was a big mistake because it jeopardized the solvency of the USD, a fiat currency; and, therefore, the very heart of the U.S. economy itself. Big business will not stand for that.<br /><br />New York Post columnist Ralph Peters in "Eyeing Iran" (NYP, January 8, 2007) described the new U.S. military Middle East leadership lineup with General Patreus going to Iraq and Admiral Fallon going to CENTCOM as a sign for the future. Appointing a naval officer to command CENTCOM for the first time is seen as a harbinger of things to come with regard to Iraq, Somalia, and in particular, Iran. The Persian Gulf and the Indian Ocean are key geographical areas in this region. Any attempts by Iran (or anyone else for that matter) to block key strategic geographic features, such as the Strait of Hormuz, or otherwise impede the transport of oil or strategic materials could be met with an instantaneous naval military response. The presence of increased naval forces in the area could also be a sign of potential military action.<br /><br />What has become more even important than national boundaries, according to Anthony Wile in High Alert (High Alert Publishing, 2007), is the control and domination exercised by global elites over the economies of nations and the destinies of people. Few people are aware of this relationship and this excellent book goes into detail describing how this works. These are the forces that are currently in play worldwide that affect the U.S., Iraq, and Iran, among many other nations.<br /><br />So when Iraq President Saddam Hussein said in 2000 that Iraq would begin selling Iraqi oil using the euro instead of the USD he instantly became a marked man. Why; because it is vital to the solvency of U.S. fiat currency that there are many foreign holders of the USD in order to keep it afloat; to keep it solvent. This is particularly important in the oil markets where trade must be conducted using the USD that the United States set as the standard long ago for oil purchases. This was done on purpose (Krassimir Petrov, "The Proposed Iranian Oil Bourse," Energy Bulletin, January 26, 2006).<br /><br />Iran's plan to complete with dollar-dominated and American-owned New York's NYMEX and London's IPE, met with frosty reception from the beginning and things never got better. Because of the United States' high debt levels and stated neo-conservative quest for world domination, the euro inroads to establish a foothold in the dollar-dominated world oil market and posed a direct threat both to the U.S. dollar and to the U.S. economy (William Clark, "The Real Reasons Why Iran is the next Target," Energy Bulletin, October 26, 2004).<br />=========<br />I've posted on this subject numerous times over the past year. All these wars always boil down to one thing, money, always have, always will. The people have allowed this infection to fester far too long, now there is no stopping it, it will be the death of us.Saladinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11756928226921879640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-21264749812213119752007-01-11T09:23:00.000-07:002007-01-11T09:23:00.000-07:00Blood Meridian: Bush's High Crimes of Torture and ...Blood Meridian: Bush's High Crimes of Torture and War<br />Chris Floyd, Atlantic Free Press<br /><br />The regimen of torture and suffering being inflicted on captives in Bush's War of Terror is not some sort of aberrant overreaction to concerns about national security and public safety: these specifically designed, deliberately induced tortures are the expression of the President's deepest desires and clearly stated wishes. Just as the war of aggression in Iraq is his war, these crimes against humanity are his crimes. They are happening because he wants them too. <br /><br />The only possible response of a sane society to the depredations of this man is his impeachment and removal from power. There is no other course of action for any responsible, patriotic member of Congress to take. Unfortunately, the American Establishment has clearly gone insane — so deranged from decades of bloated power and privilege that it can no longer act even to save itself from the general ruin that Bush is bringing upon the country. Unfortunately, there are very, very few responsible, patriotic members of Congress. <br /><br />Witness the empty bluster behind the latest Democratic "opposition": in the face of Bush's imminent escalation of the war — with a "surge" that cannot possibly succeed in doing anything but increasing the bloodshed and hatred in the other nation he has ruined — they are offering a "series of symbolic votes" that "would do nothing in practical terms" to stop or even hinder this insane course, as the NY Times reports. The ever-hapless hairpiece hero, Joe Biden, believes this witless flapping of arms will "demonstrate to the president that he's on his own" — a realization that will somehow "spark real change." <br /><br />But Bush already believes he is on his own — and he likes that way. He has already asserted that he will continue his course in Iraq even if he is deserted by everyone but his wife and dog. And his little mouthpiece, Tony Snow, has just announced that the President is an autocrat who cannot be restrained by any action of Congress whatsoever: "The President has the ability to exercise his own authority if he thinks Congress has voted the wrong way." (Via Cenk Uygur by way of Steve Gilliard.)<br /><br />"Symbolic votes" won't stop Bush. Even substantive actions — such as cutting off funding — will not stop him. He will clearly provoke a constitutional crisis and continue the war (and the tortures in his gulag) by any means necessary. He is probably willing to attempt to overthrow the government altogether with a military coup if he feels he is being thwarted in his "sacred duty as Commander-in-Chief to protect the nation," which, in his mind, means waging aggressive war, torturing people, spying on us all and looting the treasury on behalf of his cronies. The only possible way to derail his destructive and criminal course is impeachment. <br /><br />But how will that happen with the weak reeds and blathering hairpieces now in charge of Congress? What will it take to light a fire under them and force them to do what they are legally and morally bound to do — uphold the Constitution? Will they really let Bush go on and on, in slaughter and torture, escalating the war crime in Iraq and very likely launching a new war against Iran? <br /><br />If the past five years is any indication, the answer is yes, they will. Consider that most leading Democrats are even more hawkish in their saber-rattling at Iran than the Bush Administration, which is even now methodically preparing for war with Tehran, either via a direct U.S. strike or else in reaction to the inevitable Iranian response to an attack by Israel. How can the bellicose Democrats object when Bush puts blood and iron to their rhetoric? A strike on Iran would be the perfect way to "restore bipartisan unity on the Hill."<br /><br />Yet we live in hope and die in despair, as Brother Edsel always says. So keep pounding the drum: impeach, impeach, impeach. Make it so loud that one day it might even pierce the hairpiece of Joe Biden, and convince the cowardly lions of Congress to do their duty. The alternative is too ghastly to contemplate — although that grim reality may well be thrust upon us. But for God's sake, let's not go down without a fight.<br />=========<br />This is wearing me out. If they won't obey the law, how can we make them, short of all out revolution?Saladinhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11756928226921879640noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8529911467686742944.post-17953031988983573132007-01-11T09:08:00.000-07:002007-01-11T09:08:00.000-07:00Breaking: US killed no top Qaeda targets in Somali...Breaking: US killed no top Qaeda targets in Somalia strike... Raw Story<br /><br />****************************<br /><br />Extrajudicial killings, no judge, no jury, only death from above by A-130 gunship.<br /><br />Murder.Robert Shttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01770441579698726632noreply@blogger.com